Tom:
Yep, you're right about the difficulty of seeing what's going on in a video of lighting, especially considering that even the stock LED headlights appear to flicker in videos. Someday I might try to record at different frame-per-second rates -- higher and lower -- to see what happens. But then again, YouTube might alter those rates. I'm not sure what to do about this sort of thing.
More to the point of your question, I think I've confused you a bit, regarding what lights I've added. Pay attention here, because there WILL be a quiz afterward.
I got Photon
Boosters --
https://skenelights.com/photon-booster-led-modules-pair.html -- for the
FRONT, not Photon
Blasters --
https://skenelights.com/photon-blaster.html . Only the Blaster modules have Skene's "patented flicker," which is what I think you're talking about.
I went with the $80 Boosters instead of the $140 Blasters up front because of my experience out back. Let me explain.
Last year, I added the $165 P3-TS lights out back. These are essentially the same thing as the Blasters -- LED modules and controller -- and I also detail that work earlier in my gallery. I had the default "conspicuity flicker" enabled for them, but only at first. Take a quick read through
https://skenelights.com/photon-blaster-installation--iq-250-series.html .
The problem, I decided, was that this flicker was too pronounced, IMO. It almost looked as if the four-way flashers were enabled, in normal riding-down-road mode. I don't think that this was related to the CANbus, as Skene products are used on all sorts of Beemers (Skene's favorite brand, I'd say), for instance. It MIGHT have been related to the lack of a load resistor; on that installation-info page, they note: "On bikes that monitor bulb continuity the other end of the cut wire must be connected to a load resistor and then to ground." I really don't know.
In any event, shortly after I made my first Skene video, the one of just the P3-TS lights, I turned off the flicker mode for those rear lights.
(It is a really nice feature with the Blaster controller that you can change the operation of lights without doing any physical wiring changes. Just go through their trick sequence of squeezing the brake lever.)
So, when it came time to order lights for the front, I went with the non-controller, non-flicker, model, i.e., the cheaper Boosters instead of the Blasters.
I will say this, though:
1) Those Boosters -- i.e., the LED modules that Skene sells -- are very impressively bright, without any tricks! That's why I continued to patronize Skene. The front Boosters really are almost painful to look at in the garage: very bright, and with a very wide beam pattern.
And the P3-TS out back are the same bright LEDs. And the fact that they synchronize with and augment the stock turn signals -- that is, they're not just running lights out back -- is an added bonus.
So I am pleased with my flickerless installation of the red P3-TS system out back and the amber Booster system in front, would do it again if the bike were crashed or stolen, etc.!
2) About three years ago, I bought the Photon Blasters -- amber, up front -- as a (birthday or xmas or something) present for my local riding buddy. This was for his 2012 RT. And they work fine on that bike, including the trick from-the-side flicker. It's a very subtle effect, though, definitely not pronounced. I can tell that they have this capability, if I look really hard for it. To me, I'm not convinced that the flicker is worth having, even when it works as intended on that older bike.
Bottom line: IMO, the Booster -- that's a Blaster, minus the controller and all its capabilities -- is excellent for the front. And for the rear, the Blaster-like P3-TS is very good, and I use the controller in that setup only for turn-signal augmentation, not for flickering.
All that make sense now, or have I just confused you some more?